Facebook Sucks - Amazon Google Facebook Criminal Antitrust Conspiracy
  • Home
Facebook Sucks - Amazon Google Facebook Criminal Antitrust Conspiracy
Picture
Facebook asked users if pedophiles should be able to ask kids for 'sexual pictures'
Over 300 cases of child exploitation went unnoticed by Facebook – Reports show that as users on Facebook have increased, so has the number of child exploitation cases.

A report suggests the tech giant is not fully enforcing its own standards banning content that exploits or endangers children

Facebook failed to catch hundreds of cases of child exploitation on its platform over the past six years, a study published on Wednesday found.

The site was used as a medium to sexually exploit children in at least 366 cases between January 2013 and December 2019, a report from the not-for-profit investigative group Tech Transparency Project (TPP) analyzing Department of Justice news releases found.

Only 9% of the 366 cases were investigated because Facebook alerted authorities, while the rest of the investigations were initiated by authorities without prompting from the social media giant.

This suggests Facebook is not doing all it can to enforce its community standards, which bans “content that sexually exploits or endangers children,” said TPP executive director Daniel Stevens.

Social media firms to be penalised for not removing child abuse

“The data shows Facebook is not doing as much as it should to address this very serious problem affecting many lives in this country,” Stevens said.

The reports analyzed by the TPP include a Rhode Island man who allegedly posed as a teenage girl to lure boys into live streaming sexual activity on Facebook Messenger, a Kentucky man accused of sending thousands of messages to more than one child target over Facebook, and a convicted Missouri sex offender who authorities said used Facebook Messenger to communicate with a 13-year-old girl.

As users on Facebook have increased, so has the number of child exploitation cases. There were as many as 23 cases per quarter in 2019 compared to just 10 per quarter in 2013.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has repeatedly noted the company’s efforts to address child exploitation on the platform. Facebook did not respond to a request for comment.

“Child exploitation is one of the most serious threats that we focus on,” CEO Mark Zuckerberg told lawmakers in October 2019. “We build sophisticated systems to find this behavior.”

The company also appears to have taken on more enforcement responsibility since the passage of FOSTA-SESTA, which allows law enforcement to hold companies liable for what occurs on their platforms. Though the legislation has been criticized for its adverse affects on sex workers and other professions, it has forced Facebook to address online sexual exploitation of children, the report showed.

One month after FOSTA-SESTA was passed, Facebook was sued by an alleged victim of sexual abuse who said that at age 15 she was targeted and groomed by sex traffickers using Facebook.

In the five years before the controversial bill’s passage, Facebook averaged less than one cyber tip per quarter, according to TTP analysis. Since the bill was passed in March 2018, it has averaged more than three reports per quarter. Facebook and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children have made more reports in the last two years since the passage of FOSTA-SESTA than in the prior five years combined.

Facebook has been criticized in the past for inaction in the face of reports regarding the exploitation of children on the platform. In February 2016 the BBC discovered Facebook groups where pedophiles swapped stolen images of children and reported 20 inappropriate images to Facebook as part of the investigation. The company took down only four. Following its report, the TPP alerted Facebook to a public page hosting an inappropriate picture of a young girl aimed at pedophiles, but the company did not remove it.

Facebook has said it has “zero tolerance” for such images and uses a technology called PhotoDNA to scan each image and flagged known child exploitative material to stop uploads of such imagery on the platform.

The TPP report comes as US regulators are set to introduce legislation to force tech giants to crack down on child exploitation on their platforms. A bipartisan bill from senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal, called the Earn It Act, is expected to be introduced as early as Wednesday. Under the new act, platforms would be required to more aggressively address child sexual exploitation or risk losing protections under Section 230, a measure that prevents platforms from being held responsible for content posted on them.

While bipartisan support grows for holding tech giants accountable for exploitative content, the digital rights not-for-profit the Electronic Frontier Foundation has called Section 230 “the most important law protecting internet speech”. Facebook has expressed concerns the Earn It Act would weaken those free speech protections and roll back privacy efforts like encryption.

“We share the Earn It Act sponsors’ commitment to child safety and have made keeping children safe online a top priority by developing and deploying technology to thwart the sharing of child abuse material,” Facebook spokesman Thomas Richards said in a statement. “We’re concerned the Earn It Act may be used to roll back encryption, which protects everyone’s safety from hackers and criminals, and may limit the ability of American companies to provide the private and secure services that people expect.”

The justice department will unveil its own action against child exploitation on Thursday, with a proposal of 11 “voluntary principles” for tech platforms to target the issue. It was co-authored with members of the tech industry and is already backed by leaders of five countries, the Washington Post reported.

Kari Paul - The Guardian

Ten Years of Protecting Our Children - Cracking Down on Sexual Predators on the Internet

A decade ago, a 10-year-old boy disappeared from his Brentwood, Maryland, neighborhood. Within weeks, the investigation would uncover two pedophiles and a larger ring of online child pornographers. Within two years, it would spawn a major national initiative that is now the centerpiece of the FBI’s efforts to protect children from predatory pedophiles in cyberspace.

Here’s how the events unfolded: When FBI agents and Prince George’s County police detectives went door-to-door to talk with neighbors following the boy’s disappearance in 1993, they encountered a pair of suspicious men who had been “befriending” local children, showering them with gifts and even taking them on vacation.

Evidence followed that the men had been sexually abusing children for a quarter century. More recently, they had moved online, setting up a private computer bulletin board service not only to “chat” with boys and set up meetings with them but also to share illicit images of child pornography.

That, in turn, led investigators to a larger ring of computer pedophiles. When a similar case with national reach turned up the following year, the FBI realized it was onto an alarming new trend: sexual exploitation of children via the Internet.

A Program is born. In 1995, the FBI created its Innocent Images National Initiative (IINI). Its goals: to break up networks of online pedophiles, to stop sexual predators from using the Internet to lure children from their families, and to rescue victims.

Today, 28 of the FBI’s 56 field offices have undercover Innocent Images operations. More than 200 FBI agents work these cases. Some pose as teenagers or pre-teens in chat rooms to identify “travelers” who seek to meet and abuse children.

Others focus on dismantling major child exploitation enterprises.

Since 1995, we’ve opened more than 10,000 total cases and helped secure nearly 3,000 convictions.

Keeping Safe. To report child pornography and/or potential cases involving the sexual exploitation of children, please contact the Crimes Against Children Coordinator at your local FBI Field Office. You can also file an online report at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children’s CyberTipline at www.cybertipline.com; these reports are forwarded to the appropriate law enforcement authorities.

Reporting to authorities

Calling 800–4-A-Child connects you with the Childhelp National Abuse Hotline. — How to Report Suspected Pedophile Activity

Suspicions of internet-based child sexual abuse, like hosting child pornography websites, should be directed to the FBI.

Suspicions of a local adult who may be grooming and engaging in sexual contact with children should be reported to the local police.

Reports of suspected sexual abuse should include as much information as possible, including the names of the parties involved, the location where the alleged abuse has occurred or is currently occurring, whether the reporter believes the child is in immediate danger, the signs that led the reporter to believe the child is being abused and contact information for the child’s parent or legal guardian.

Some professions require legal reporting to the authorities:

•Teachers.
•Children’s librarians.
•Police officers.
•Clergy members.
•Medical professionals.
•Social services employees.

Paedophiles using secret Facebook groups to swap images

Paedophiles are using secret groups on Facebook to post and swap obscene images of children, the BBC has found.

Settings on the social network mean the groups are invisible to most users and only members can see the content.

Children's Commissioner for England Anne Longfield said Facebook was not doing enough to police the groups and protect children.

Facebook's head of public policy told the BBC he was committed to removing "content that shouldn't be there".

A BBC investigation found a number of secret groups, created by and run for men with a sexual interest in children, including one being administered by a convicted paedophile who was still on the sex offenders' register.

The groups have names that give a clear indication of their content and contain pornographic and highly suggestive images, many purporting to be of children. They also have sexually explicit comments posted by users.

We found pages specialising in pictures of girls in school uniform - accompanied by obscene posts.

Images appeared to be stolen from newspapers, blogs and even clothing catalogues, while some were photographs taken secretly, and up close, in public places. One user had even posted a video of a children's dance show. - by Angus

Crawford BBC News

Facebook responsible for 94% of 69 million child sex abuse images reported by US tech firms

The figures emerge as the UK is among seven nations warning of the impact of end-to-end encryption on public safety online.

Facebook was responsible for 94% of the 69 million child sex abuse images reported by US technology companies last year.

The figures emerged as seven countries, including the UK, published a statement on Sunday warning of the impact of end-to-end encryption on public safety online.

Facebook has previously announced plans to fully encrypt communications in its Messenger app, as well as its Instagram Direct service - on top of WhatsApp, which is already encrypted - meaning no one apart from the sender and recipient can read or modify messages.

The social media site said the changes are designed to improve user privacy on all of its platforms.

But law enforcement agencies fear the move will have a devastating impact on their ability to target paedophiles and protect children online.

But the National Crime Agency (NCA) has warned the number could drop to zero if Facebook presses ahead with end-to-end encryption.

Millions of child sex abuse images have been shared on Facebook


Some 16.9 million referrals were made by US tech firms to the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) last year, including 69 million images of children being abused - up 50% on the previous year.

Some 94% of the reports, which include the worst category of images, came from Facebook, Home Office officials said.

Robert Jones, the NCA director responsible for tackling child sexual abuse, said of the plan: "The lights go out, the door gets slammed, and we lose all of that insight. It is as simple as that.

"And nothing, you know we're relying on the best technical expertise... in the UK, the same people that keep the UK safe against terrorists, hostile states, cyber attacks, are telling us there is no viable alternative. I believe them. And I am deeply concerned."

The NCA believes there are at least 300,000 people in the UK who pose a sexual threat to children, with 86,832 UK-related referrals to NCMEC last year, including 52% from Facebook and 11% from Instagram.

Mr Jones said industry reporting led to the arrest of more than 4,500 offenders and the safeguarding of around 6,000 children in the UK in the year to June 2020.

He continued: "The end-to-end encryption model that's being proposed takes out of the game one of the most successful ways for us to identify leads, and that layers on more complexity to our investigations, our digital media, our digital forensics, our profiling of individuals and our live intelligence leads, which allow us to identify victims and safeguard them.

"What we risk losing with these changes is the content, which gives us the intelligence leads to pursue those offenders and rescue those children."

Home Office officials say Facebook has not published credible plans to protect child safety a year on from Home Secretary Priti Patel's open letter to the firm's co-founder Mark Zuckerberg asking it to halt its end-to-end encryption proposals.

A statement signed by Ms Patel, along with the US, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, India and Japan - whose populations represent around a fifth of Facebook's two billion global users - is calling for tech companies to ensure they don't blind themselves to criminality on their platforms.

Ms Patel said: "We owe it to all of our citizens, especially our children, to ensure their safety by continuing to unmask sexual predators and terrorists operating online."

The statement calls for public safety to be embedded in systems, for law enforcement to be given access to content, and for engagement with governments.

It reads: "Encryption is an existential anchor of trust in the digital world and we do not support counter-productive and dangerous approaches that would materially weaken or limit security systems

"Particular implementations of encryption technology, however, pose significant challenges to public safety, including to highly vulnerable members of our societies like sexually exploited children."

Sky News, Tom Gillespie - October 12, 2020

Facebook reported more than 20 million child sexual abuse images in 2020, more than any other company The material was flagged to the NCMEC, a charity that fights child sexual abuse.

Facebook reported more than 20 million child sexual abuse images on its platform in 2020, according to a new report by the National Council for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC).

According to the report released Wednesday, Facebook recorded 20,307,216 instances for child sexual exploitation on its platforms in 2020. The figures cover Instagram as well as the main Facebook site.

Insider first reported the figures in January, when Facebook confirmed the number. The full report has figures for other companies, and shows that Facebook made more than 35 times as many reports as the next company on the list, Google.

Facebook's platforms contain the vast majority of all child sexual content flagged to the NCMEC, which represent a 31% increase on the 16 million images reported to them by the platform in 2019.

Facebook highlighted its proactive policies and use of technology to detect and remove child exploitation material in response to the increase.

"Using industry-leading technology, over 99% of child exploitation content we remove from Facebook and Instagram is found and taken down before it's reported to us," said a spokesperson to Insider in January.

Other sites remove material after it is found or flagged to them, but don't have proactive policies to find it.

Following Facebook, the platforms with the most reports were:

•Google with 546,704.
•Snapchat with 144,095.
•Microsoft with 96,776.
•Twitter with 65,062.
•TikTok with 22,692.
•Omegle (a video and text chat platform) with 20,265.

Mindgeek, the company that owns porn websites including PornHub, logged 13,229 reports. Last year a series of credit card companies severed ties with Pornhub after it was revealed by The New York Times' that the site was hosting child sexual exploitation videos.

Facebook said in a blog post ahead of the release of the NCMEC report that it was building new tools to track down child sexual abuse material, and that most of the material it identified was old material being shared or re-sent.

"We found that more than 90 percent of this content was the same as or visually similar to previously reported content," said the post.

"And copies of just six videos were responsible for more than half of the child exploitative content we reported in that time period. While this data indicates that the number of pieces of content does not equal the number of victims, and that the same content, potentially slightly altered, is being shared repeatedly, one victim of this horrible crime is one too many."

The NCMEC told Insider in January that COVID-19 lockdowns were likely among the factors behind the overall increase in the amount of material reported to them in 2020.

Vulnerable children were less able to get help, and there was a new trend of abuse being livestreamed on demand, said the NCMEC at the time.

The 160 companies signed up to the NCMEC's child sexual abuse reporting mechanism voluntarily share the information, which is then used by law enforcement to investigate people committing the crimes.

Insider by Tom Porter Feb 26, 2021

FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization

December 9, 2020

Agency challenges Facebook’s multi-year course of unlawful conduct

The Federal Trade Commission today sued Facebook, alleging that the company is illegally maintaining its personal social networking monopoly through a years-long course of anticompetitive conduct. Following a lengthy investigation in cooperation with a coalition of attorneys general of 46 states, the District of Columbia, and Guam, the complaint alleges that Facebook has engaged in a systematic strategy—including its 2012 acquisition of up-and-coming rival Instagram, its 2014 acquisition of the mobile messaging app WhatsApp, and the imposition of anticompetitive conditions on software developers—to eliminate threats to its monopoly. This course of conduct harms competition, leaves consumers with few choices for personal social networking, and deprives advertisers of the benefits of competition.

The FTC is seeking a permanent injunction in federal court that could, among other things: require divestitures of assets, including Instagram and WhatsApp; prohibit Facebook from imposing anticompetitive conditions on software developers; and require Facebook to seek prior notice and approval for future mergers and acquisitions.

“Personal social networking is central to the lives of millions of Americans,” said Ian Conner, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition. “Facebook’s actions to entrench and maintain its monopoly deny consumers the benefits of competition. Our aim is to roll back Facebook’s anticompetitive conduct and restore competition so that innovation and free competition can thrive.”

According to the FTC’s complaint, Facebook is the world’s dominant personal social networking service and has monopoly power in a market for personal social networking services.  This unmatched position has provided Facebook with staggering profits. Last year alone, Facebook generated revenues of more than $70 billion and profits of more than $18.5 billion.

Anticompetitive Acquisitions

According to the FTC’s complaint, Facebook targeted potential competitive threats to its dominance. Instagram, a rapidly growing startup, emerged at a critical time in personal social networking competition, when users of personal social networking services were migrating from desktop computers to smartphones, and when consumers were increasingly embracing photo-sharing. The complaint alleges that Facebook executives, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, quickly recognized that Instagram was a vibrant and innovative personal social network and an existential threat to Facebook’s monopoly power.

The complaint alleges that Facebook initially tried to compete with Instagram on the merits by improving its own offerings, but Facebook ultimately chose to buy Instagram rather than compete with it. Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram for $1 billion in April 2012 allegedly both neutralizes the direct threat posed by Instagram and makes it more difficult for another personal social networking competitor to gain scale.

Around the same time, according to the complaint, Facebook perceived that “over-the-top” mobile messaging apps also presented a serious threat to Facebook’s monopoly power. In particular, the complaint alleges that Facebook’s leadership understood—and feared—that a successful mobile messaging app could enter the personal social networking market, either by adding new features or by spinning off a standalone personal social networking app.

The complaint alleges that, by 2012, WhatsApp had emerged as the clear global “category leader” in mobile messaging. Again, according to the complaint, Facebook chose to buy an emerging threat rather than compete, and announced an agreement in February 2014 to acquire WhatsApp for $19 billion. Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp allegedly both neutralizes the prospect that WhatsApp itself might threaten Facebook’s personal social networking monopoly and ensures that any future threat will have a more difficult time gaining scale in mobile messaging.

Anticompetitive Platform Conduct

The complaint also alleges that Facebook, over many years, has imposed anticompetitive conditions on third-party software developers’ access to valuable interconnections to its platform, such as the application programming interfaces (“APIs”) that allow the developers’ apps to interface with Facebook. In particular, Facebook allegedly has made key APIs available to third-party applications only on the condition that they refrain from developing competing functionalities, and from connecting with or promoting other social networking services.

The complaint alleges that Facebook has enforced these policies by cutting off API access to blunt perceived competitive threats from rival personal social networking services, mobile messaging apps, and other apps with social functionalities. For example, in 2013, Twitter launched the app Vine, which allowed users to shoot and share short video segments. In response, according to the complaint, Facebook shut down the API that would have allowed Vine to access friends via Facebook.

The lawsuit follows an investigation by the FTC’s Technology Enforcement Division, whose staff cooperated closely with a coalition of attorneys general, under the coordination of the New York State Office of the Attorney General. Participating Attorneys General include: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file for a permanent injunction and other equitable relief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia was 3-2. Commissioners Noah Joshua Phillips and Christine S. Wilson voted no.

NOTE: The Commission issues a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers.  You can learn more about how competition benefits consumers or file an antitrust complaint.

Betsy Lordan elordan@ftc.gov - Office of Public Affairs 202-326-3707

Facebook Just Gave 2.8 Billion Users A Reason To Quit Their Accounts - Forbes, April 15, 2021

Facebook has had a bad month and, having lost the data of 533 million users, new revelations may just make the social media giant’s 2.8 billion active users think about calling it quits.

The revelations come from two very different sources: a university student and a prominent UK newspaper, but both are likely to significantly undermine trust in the social network.

The first comes from a viral thread posted by student Zamaan Qureshi:

“So I decided to download my Facebook data after learning I was a part of the 533m breach,” he explained. “Clicked on a folder called “your_off_facebook_activity” and was unsurprised to learn that Facebook is following me all over the internet.”
 
Qureshi attaches a video (below) of what this means, showing hundreds of files recording his browsing activity. This ranges from records of him ordering pizza to university applications and registration to political sites. Moreover, Qureshi explains that this happened after he deleted his “off-Facebook activity” from the site and disabled off-site tracking (two Facebook privacy settings).

Serious Warning Issued For Millions Of WhatsApp Users - Forbes, April 17, 2021

Facebook has its own problems right now, but things just got a lot worse as a serious warning has now been issued for millions of WhatsApp users.

In a new report titled: “How a WhatsApp status loophole is aiding cyberstalkers”, cybersecurity firm Traced has revealed flaws in WhatsApp security are creating a growth industry in tracking and stalking the app’s users. Moreover, there’s nothing you can do about it.

“When someone comes online in WhatsApp (that is, they open the app or bring it to the foreground), an indicator changes, setting their status to ‘Online’”, Traced explains. “This indicator is public information, and can be used by anyone to build a service that watches out for this online status indicator.”
 
While Traced redacted the names of the services exploiting this (and I have respected this), it did publish some chilling examples of what they promise:

“Tracker1‘s own marketing on their website: ‘If you suspect a cheating spouse, boyfriend or girlfriend… [Tracker1]’s WhatsApp last seen tracker online can help you to confirm whether or not your suspicions are really true.”

Should Amazon, and/or CEO Jeff Bezos, along with Google and/or Sundar Pichai be prosecuted for Criminal Antitrust Conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act or the Clayton Antitrust Act, and if found guilty how many years should Jeff Bezos, Andy Jassy and Sundar Pichai or any of the other high ranking executives be incarcerated in Federal Prison?
Collusion is a deceitful agreement or secret cooperation between two or more parties to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading or defrauding others of their legal right. Collusion is not always considered illegal. It can be used to attain objectives forbidden by law; for example, by defrauding or gaining an unfair market advantage. It is an agreement among firms or individuals to divide a market, set prices, limit production or limit opportunities. It can involve "unions, wage fixing, kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship between the colluding parties". In legal terms, all acts effected by collusion are considered void.

Amazon and Google are engaged in a collusion which is a secret agreement or cooperation especially for an illegal or deceitful purpose and have illegally conspired together, in violation of both state and federal antitrust laws, to prevent this website, and the 200+ websites listed herein, from appearing in their appropriate locations within the Google search because they don't want the public to learn about their many illegal activities. The website domain names contain very specific keyword phrases for the express purpose of being located in the first or second pages on Google, based upon the algorithms utilized, yet most do not show up at all or are deliberately relegated to the last or next to last pages so the general public will never be aware of their existence thereby accomplishing Amazon and Google's goal of not allowing the content to be viewed considering that the majority of internet visitors rarely search for anything beyond the very few pages at the beginning regardless of what they search for. Amazon nor Google should be allowed to participate in illegal censorship.

Amazon's CEO Jeff Bezos and the incoming CEO Andy Jassy along with Google's CEO Sundar Pichai are not honest people and the owner of these websites anxiously anticipate the time when the three of them can be questioned at length on the witness stand regarding their unlawful actions in conjunction with the documentation to verify their respective crimes.

Both Amazon and Google consistently engage in "antitrust evils", to coin a phrase used by numerous states Attorneys General in the current Antitrust lawsuits against Google and soon to be Amazon, for their flagrant abuses of the law. These individuals are criminals in the purest sense and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and should be incarcerated in prison for decades because they are "criminal sociopaths" and will never act honestly towards the millions of people who use their services! They are no better than your common street thugs stealing purses from the elderly or mistreating young children, these individuals have no morals nor a conscience.

Amazon Notorious Markets
Amazon Notorious Markets - A Company That Facilitates Illegal Counterfeits and Piracy
Is Amazon Notorious Markets a Conspiracy in Restraint of Trade?
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos testifies under oath to United States Congress that they sell 'Stolen Goods'
You Can't Fight Gravity!
Did Jeff Bezos, the founder and CEO of Amazon,
lie under oath to the United States Congress? Let’s find out!

Jeff Bezos admits 'stolen and counterfeit goods' are being sold on Amazon!

No one should be above the law, not even Jeff Bezos, common thieves deal in 'stolen goods' and when found guilty in a court of law they are sentenced to prison, Jeff Bezos should be no different!


What separates Jeff Bezos from the Ponzie criminal Bernie Madoff? Steel Bars and Armed Guards!

On February 2, 2021 the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) just fined Amazon $61.7 Million Dollars for STEALING TIP money from their own delivery drivers, how low can one company get! How low can Jeff Bezos be but to allow, or maybe even instruct, Amazon to STEAL millions of dollars from their own hard working delivery drivers, absolutely despicable!


Jeff Bezos admitted emphatically that he knowingly allowed Amazon to sell 'stolen goods' which is also know as stolen property, stolen merchandise etc. and he should be held accountable and forced to face a criminal trial jury of his peers. If found guilty, it would be extremely difficult to render any other verdict, as he testified under oath to Congress and that Congressional Hearing was televised and viewed by millions of people around the world that Amazon sells 'stolen goods'.

Amazon, by Jeff Bezos' testimony, has over a million third-party sellers so it would be reasonable to conclude even a miniscule percentage could amount to tens of thousands of 'stolen goods' would be handled by Amazon and therefore the penalty for each individual infraction could conceivably bring about several years in prison and then multiplied by the massive number of sales of 'stolen goods' could amount to a lifetime behind bars, and the evidence of his direct and irrefutable testimony would cause his conviction without the need for any witnesses. And to even magnify this each act of selling 'stolen goods' is the direct result of receiving 'stolen goods', another set of felonies for each. Jeff Bezos, if convicted, may never see the light of day beyond his prison walls. Amazon did nothing to investigate and vet these sellers to determine for themselves that none of this property was stolen or counterfeit so he deserves whatever sentence the various juries decide. Had Amazon conducted sufficient due diligence instead of just being focused on the almighty dollar they could have easily prevented this criminal action of receiving and selling 'stolen goods'.

All of the District Attorneys and Attorneys General in every jurisdiction throughout the United States could prosecute Jeff Bezos and in addition to prison incarceration could quite possibly enforce Billions of Dollars in fines and court costs which very well may reduce Jeff Bezos from being the richest man in the world to just your average every day common felon criminal. Daunting thought to say the least. Jeff Bezos may receive his come uppings and he has no one else to blame except himself for being so greedy as to knowingly sell 'stolen goods'.

In August 2019 the FBI uncovered a theft ring in Seattle, where Amazon is headquartered, that sold millions of dollars' of 'stolen goods' on Amazon.com in just the past 6 years FBI agent Ariana Kroshinsky wrote in her affidavit.

The guilty must face the consequences of their actions and Jeff Bezos must be held to the same legal standards that all Americans agree to live by and he may have become a multi billionaire because he engaged in selling 'stolen goods' where the great majority of Americans walk the narrow path of honesty instead of criminal activity and apparently Jeff Bezos chose the easy road with impunity!

Approximately 145 Million people around the globe subscribe to Amazon's "Prime" accounts and pay billions of dollars for the privilege believing that Amazon would act in their best interest and never sell them any counterfeit, dangerous, defective or 'stolen goods' and because Amazon deceived them they at the very least should have the entirety of their costs refunded to them which would most likely amount to BILLIONS of dollars which would then affect the income to Amazon being decreased exponentially and subsequently reduce the stock value accordingly. Amazon would be required to file documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission of these 'material facts'.

There is another possible smoking gun regarding how Amazon conducts their respective businesses and that is their "Terms of Service". If their "Terms of Service" are worded in a specific way with the intent to deceive as mentioned above then quite possibly it could be construed in a court of law that it is a "Scheme or Artifice to Defraud" in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1346 which could eliminate it from their business entirely by making it invalid and unenforceable in every aspect. This would open up a whole new legal quandary for Amazon should the courts decide to deem their "Terms of Service" unenforceable.

Most major corporations have a 'morals clause' as part of their employee contracts which should include all executives and members of the Board of Directors, wherein if any of them violate it they should be terminated for committing or allowing knowingly criminal acts such as multiple felonies. It would be difficult, if not impossible to claim 'plausible deniability' since the CEO Jeff Bezos admitted under oath his direct knowledge of Amazon engaging in the selling of 'stolen goods'.

Another gleaming aspect of this criminal behavior within Amazon's hierarchy is that in the commission of this very serious crime situation is that the law requires what is referred to as "Clawback" which details that all money generated in the act of committing a Felony the proceeds can be confiscated and/or forfeited to the respective governmental agencies having jurisdiction.

In the case with Jeff Bezos, if found guilty, his multiple million dollar personal acquisitions such as his mansions in Beverly Hills and Washington D.C. and the newspaper Washington Post etc. should also be forfeited as the benefits gained from illegal activity selling 'stolen goods.'

At the risk of being redundant, no one should be above the law which would include Jeff Bezos and when prosecuted finalized and established that he is guilty his forfeitures should amount to several Billion dollars. He was aware of his crimes and did nothing to prevent it and therefore 'if you can't do the time, don't do the crime". We reap exactly what we sow, including the richest man in the world.

The numerous law enforcement agencies who have jurisdiction of the crimes locations, which might be all 50 states, should prosecute every high ranking executive within Amazon including but not limited to CEO Jeff Bezos to the fullest extent of the law and sentence them to the maximum number of years possible to set an example that literally no one is above the law and thus these severe penalties will be a deterrent to any other corporate execs to refrain from engaging is such egregious activities against their fellow man!

There may be other foreign entities such as Canada, the European Union, Great Britain, Ireland among numerous others that want to initiate their own legal proceedings against Amazon, Jeff Bezos along with additional senior executives who participated and allowed the crime of selling 'stolen goods' to have their day in court.

Jeff Bezos may come to 'Rue the Day' that he admitted under oath to selling 'stolen goods'!

On Wednesday, July 29, 2020, the world's richest man, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, testified under oath before the United States Congress answering questions regarding his company's anti-competitive behavior.

During the five-hour-long Q&A session Jeff Bezos was hit with a wide array of questions about topics ranging from Amazon's controversial use of third-party seller data to turning a blind eye to counterfeit products and selling 'stolen goods'.

Being the founder and CEO, Jeff Bezos is acutely aware of literally all that happens within his Amazon empire as he would be the most knowledgeable regarding the inner workings of his own company which is precisely how he became the richest man in the entire world.

David Cicilline, the chair of the House of Representative's Antitrust subcommittee who was leading the investigation into Amazon's stated "As CEO and founder of the company, (Jeff Bezos) must be accountable for Amazon's record of dishonesty before Congress", and "In light of the gravity of this situation, I am also considering whether a perjury referral is warranted".

Congress also said that the company statements "appear to be misleading, and possibly criminally false or perjurious".

For example, when Rep. Pramila Jayapal asked him whether Amazon ever used third-party seller data to create competing products under its own label, Bezos dodged that direct and specific question by replying "I can't answer yes or no to that question".  

"We have a policy against using seller-specific data to aid our private-label business", he added, "But I can't guarantee you that that policy has never been violated". Jeff Bezos knows full well what takes place at Amazon, he answered in that verbiage to cover himself and not be found guilty of perjury.

Pressed to address allegations of Amazon's data appropriation exposed in a Wall Street Journal investigation in April, Bezos said he didn't know the specifics yet. "We continue to look into that very carefully".

In a separate exchange later in the hearing, Congresswoman Rep. Lucy McBath of Georgia asked Bezos whether Amazon has allowed 'stolen goods' to be sold on its platform. Rep. McBath asked Jeff Bezos, "Are 'stolen goods' sold on Amazon? To which Bezos replied, "Congresswoman, not to my knowledge". This response was absolute perjury to the United States Congress because Jeff Bezos was acutely aware of the August 2019 FBI investigation of the $10 Million dollar theft ring that sold 'stolen goods' on Amazon!

Asked more than once Jeff Bezos eventually admitted under oath that yes, Amazon does indeed sell 'stolen goods' by stating among other things that "There are more than one million sellers on Amazon. I'm sure there have been 'stolen goods' sold on Amazon".

Rep. McBath asked point blank again, "So basically Mr. Bezos that means you are saying YES?" To which Bezos finally responded, "I GUESS SO".

Pressed further by Rep. McBath on the subject of selling 'stolen goods', Jeff Bezos stated "I don't think it's a large part of what we are doing". Are you kidding Jeff Bezos, NOT A LARGE PART OF WHAT WE ARE DOING! You act as if it's no big deal but definitely something that brings in lots of income so we just close our eyes and let the money flow in from our 'stolen goods' business!

Mr. Bezos, 'Go straight to jail, do not pass go, do not collect the $200, just like the play monopoly game'! It appears to you that selling 'stolen goods' is something you take for granted and enjoy since it's part and parcel of what made you into a Billionaire and the richest man in the world. You mock the hard working honest people of America and you should be ashamed of yourself...

Law enforcement can't ignore your blatant refusal to police your own company and eliminate once and for all the criminal behavior of selling 'stolen goods' etc. and they should prosecute you Jeff Bezos just like any street criminal who robs a liquor store for a couple hundred dollars. Not only does selling Counterfeit, Dangerous, Defective, Illegal and 'Stolen Goods' hurt the consumer but cause the prices of everything any legitimate business sells to try and offset what you do on what could possibly be an every day occurence.

Every individual engaged in Law Enforcement in the United States has sworn a sacred oath to "Defend the Constitution Against All Enemies Foreign and Domestic' and to uphold the law equally regardless of who may be the criminal so they must investigate and prosecute every perpetrator including Jeff Bezos as he is an 'admitted criminal' against his own customers.

Selling 'stolen goods' is a FELONY! Receiving 'stolen goods' is also a FELONY!

Since a vast number of third-party sellers ship their goods to be sold in the 'Fulfillment by Amazon' (FBA) and Amazon then receives and stores their products within Amazon's warehouses (fulfillment centers) and then the Amazon advertises the various products for sale, uses Amazon's payment methods, and then will pick, pack and ship them in Amazon packaging to the purchasers.

A California Appeals court ruled last April that Amazon was indeed the seller of record to Angela Bolger since Amazon's activities basically conducted the entire transaction from beginning to end even though they did not manufacture the defective product and harmed Bolger severely.

In respect with 'stolen goods' Amazon receives them from the third party sellers which means Amazon is committing numerous FELONIES by becoming the recipient of 'stolen property' and then selling/delivering 'stolen goods' with the full and complete knowledge of Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos as verified by his sworn testimony before the United States Congress, can't be more substantiated proof than that! GUILTY!!!

Congress has demanded that Amazon discontinue selling 'Stolen Goods', Counterfeit, Illegal, Deadly and Deceptive Products.

There may be another possibility why sellers have chosen Amazon as their partner in crime and that is it would be the perfect mechanism to carry out 'money laundering', meaning taking the dirty money obtained via 'stolen goods' being sold at will on Amazon and then cleaning that same sales money, which is a 'Prime" method, and hopefully undetectable to Amazon since Amazon nor Jeff Bezos has been able to stem the tide of long term 'stolen goods' from being overwhelming sold on Amazon.

If Amazon has become too large and unwieldy then maybe the Federal Government should force Amazon into a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy which could then install one of their Bankruptcy Court Trustees to oversee and run the company since it appears that Jeff Bezos does not possess the necessary control capabilities to prevent and eliminate the proliferation of receiving and selling Counterfeit, Dangerous, Defective and Illegal 'Stolen Goods' from their platform.

The United States Congress should subpoena every single sales document of Amazon for at least the past 10 years to establish exactly how many transactions contained any Counterfeit, Dangerous, Defective, Illegal and 'Stolen Goods' took place and reverse those illegal sales and return the entire purchase price to the consumer victims who was deceived.


MacKenzie Scott, as she is currently known, was married to Jeff Bezos for 26 years and was MacKenzie Bezos until shortly after their divorce was final, and they had created Amazon together. She legally changed her name from Bezos, partly because she no longer wanted to be associated with his name, which is totally understandable. She recently donated over $4.5 Billion dollars of her vast divorce settlement fortune to hundreds of various charities which is an awesome benefit to the less fortunate of society and very commendable. Knowing that Jeff Bezos admitted under oath that while they were married he was involved with rampant receiving and selling Millions of dollars of 'Stolen Goods' along with Counterfeit, Dangerous, Defective, and Illegal property to unsuspecting Amazon consumers and therefore MacKenzie Scott, as she is now known, may have felt extremely guilty that her husband was so greedy that he took advantage of his customers and this might have been her way of alleviating at least some of that tremendously burdensome guilty conscience. Was MacKenzie Bezos aware at the time she was married to Jeff Bezos that his company, Amazon, was STEALING Millions of Dollars from his own delivery drivers?

We may never know if these were the true reasons, or it could possibly be due to his infidelity, either one or both, who knows. Another distinct possibility could be is that if and when he is prosecuted for these numerous felonies MacKenzie Scott wanted to be as distanced from Jeff Bezos as much as she could so she would not become entangled with his prosecution and subsequent conviction since he did testify under oath that he knowingly was party to the felony of selling 'Stolen Goods'.


This entire situation would make for a great book to be published utilizing the title for example of "Jeff Bezos, The Richest Felon". Is someone considered a 'Felon' at the time they admit under oath that they committed a 'Felony' or only when the jury has found that person guilty in a court of law? Interesting scenario nonetheless, however the book itself could become a true 'Best Seller'!

Even Amazon's highly touted cloud business, AWS (Amazon Web Services), is in shambles because in just one specific instance in August 2019 a former Amazon employee, Paige A. Thompson, was able to use her training to hack into Capital One Bank credit card division and expose over 100 Million accounts allowing their private information such as Social Security numbers, bank account info etc. to be known thereby showing to the entire world that Amazon AWS is not all that it's cracked up to be and nothing is totally safe from criminals at Amazon especially current or former employees!

California Penal Code Section § 496 - Receiving Stolen Property

Property is stolen if it was obtained by any type of theft, or by burglary or robbery. Theft includes obtaining property by larceny, embezzlement, false pretense, or trick.   

To receive property means to take possession and control of it. Two or more people can possess the property at the same time.

A person does not have to actually hold or touch something to possess it. It is enough if the person has control over it either personally or through another person.

When Amazon third-party sellers deliver 'stolen goods' to an Amazon Fulfillment Center for resale and delivery the Amazon company is then the recipient of 'stolen property' based upon the California Penal Code Section § 496, they are part and parcel of the actual act.

California Penal Code section § 496, subdivision (a) (section 496(a)) makes receiving or buying property “that has been obtained in any manner constituting theft” a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment. Section § 496, subdivision (c) (section 496(c)) provides that any person “who has been injured by a violation of (section 496(a) may bring an action for three times the amount of actual damages, if any, sustained by the plaintiff, costs of suit, and reasonable attorney's fees.”

Plaintiffs contends, based on the statutory language, a criminal conviction under section 496(a) is not a prerequisite to recovery of treble damages under section 496(c). Plaintiff asserts that the phrase “any manner constituting theft” under section 496(a) includes theft by false pretense.

Leading buyers of Amazon products without disclosing that they may be 'counterfeit, damaged, deadly, defective, illegal, and/or 'stolen goods' is tantamount to selling via false pretenses and therefore may be considered the crime of theft by false pretense under California Penal Code Section § 496.

Receiving Stolen Property (Penal Code, § 496(a)). (“(Property is stolen if it was obtained by any type of theft, or by burglary or robbery. (Theft includes obtaining property by larceny, embezzlement, false pretense, or trick.))”)

Theft by False Pretense, Larceny by Trickery, Unjust Enrichment (Price Gouging During the Coronavirus Pandemic Emergency), Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith are a few more that need to be investigated in the process of selling and receiving 'stolen goods' as they pertain to Amazon not disclosing these facts to potential buyers of the Counterfeit, Dangerous, Deadly, Defective, Illegal and 'Stolen Goods'.

California Penal Code § 532 (a) Every person who knowingly and designedly, by any false or fraudulent representation or pretense, defrauds any other person of money, labor, or property, whether real or personal, or who causes or procures others to report falsely of his or her wealth or mercantile character, and by thus imposing upon any person obtains credit, and thereby fraudulently gets possession of money or property, or obtains the labor or service of another, is punishable in the same manner and to the same extent as for larceny of the money or property so obtained.

California Penal Code § 484 Larceny (a) Every person who shall feloniously steal, take, carry, lead, or drive away the personal property of another, or who shall fraudulently appropriate property which has been entrusted to him or her, or who shall knowingly and designedly, by any false or fraudulent representation or pretense, defraud any other person of money, labor or real or personal property, or who causes or procures others to report falsely of his or her wealth or mercantile character and by thus imposing upon any person, obtains credit and thereby fraudulently gets or obtains possession of money, or property or obtains the labor or service of another, is guilty of theft.

California Penal Code § 396 (a) The Legislature hereby finds that during a state of emergency or local emergency, including, but not limited to, an earthquake, flood, fire, riot, storm, drought, plant or animal infestation or disease, pandemic or epidemic disease outbreak, or other natural or manmade disaster, some merchants have taken unfair advantage of consumers by greatly increasing prices for essential consumer goods and services. While the pricing of consumer goods and services is generally best left to the marketplace under ordinary conditions, when a declared state of emergency or local emergency results in abnormal disruptions of the market, the public interest requires that excessive and unjustified increases in the prices of essential consumer goods and services be prohibited. It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this act to protect citizens from excessive and unjustified increases in the prices charged during or shortly after a declared state of emergency or local emergency for goods and services that are vital and necessary for the health, safety, and welfare of consumers, whether those goods and services are offered or sold in person, in stores, or online. Further, it is the intent of the Legislature that this section be liberally construed so that its beneficial purposes may be served.

California Penal Code § Unjust Enrichment - In every contract or agreement there is an implied promise of good faith and fair dealing. This implied promise means that each party will not do anything to unfairly interfere with the right of any other party to receive the benefits of the contract. Good faith means honesty of purpose without any intention to mislead or to take unfair advantage of another. Generally speaking, it means being faithful to one’s duty or obligation. However, the implied promise of good faith and fair dealing cannot create obligations that are inconsistent with the terms of the contract. Amazon by the very nature of selling 'Stolen Goods' as just one example, without full disclosure has violated "Good Faith and Fair Dealing" with every buyer of property from Amazon including the 'Elderly' which would kick in Elder Financial Abuse.

Ignorance of the law is neither an excuse nor a defense of the criminal act.

The very instant that a Defendant commits any other crimes, any property so obtained was then obtained by "Theft" and thus selling said property would be considered "Stolen Property" and could immediately constitute additional crimes under California Penal Code Section § 496.

There is a relatively unknown but extremely important, legal case decided by the California Appeals Court that will have a profound effect on Amazon and Jeff Bezos regarding the receiving of and selling 'stolen goods',

California Court of Appeals Fourth District, Division 3, Penal Code Section § 498(c) making it illegal to receive stolen goods allows Treble Damages GO46166 Decided January 15, 2013 Sharon Bell v. Igal J. Feibush does not require a criminal conviction under Section § 496(a).

In Bell v. Feibush (filed January 15, 2013) 2013 DJDAR 627, Feibush argues that permitting Bell to recover treble damages under section 496(c) is contrary to public policy and permits litigants to circumvent limitations on remedies. Our decision to affirm the default judgment is based on straightforward statutory interpretation. Section 496(a) extends liability to “(e)very person who buys or receives any property that has been stolen or that has been obtained in any manner constituting theft.” (Italics added.) Penal Code section 484, subdivision (a) describes the acts constituting theft to include theft by false pretense, which is the consensual but fraudulent acquisition of property from its owner. (Pen.Code § 484, subd. (a), 532.) Feibush was found liable for fraud, i.e., for the fraudulent acquisition of property (money) from its owner (Bell). “Anything that could be the subject of a theft can also be property under section 496.” (People v. Gopal (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 524, 541, 217 Cal.Rptr. 487.) A principal in the actual theft of the property may be convicted for either theft or receiving stolen property under section 496(a).

Penal Code § 487 PC – Grand theft defined (may be charged in connection with receiving stolen property). (“Grand theft is theft committed in any of the following cases: (a) When the money, labor, or real or personal property taken is of a value exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars ($950), except as provided in subdivision (b). (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), grand theft is committed in any of the following cases: . . . (c) When the property is taken from the person of another. (d) When the property taken is any of the following: (1) An automobile, horse, mare, gelding, any bovine animal, any caprine animal, mule, jack, jenny, sheep, lamb, hog, sow, boar, gilt, barrow, or pig. (2) A firearm.”)

Plaintiff contends that under California Penal Code section § 496 Defendants, by obtaining ownership even temporarily via committing a criminal act in violation of California Penal Code section § 532 Defendant did so illegally and thus obtained momentary and temporary ownership of said property stored in an Amazon warehouse, fulfillment center, to sell to millions of unsuspecting buyers by false pretenses makes the property transfer tantamount to "receiving and then subsequently selling stolen property", a felony under California Law.

California has an extremely valuable law for Senior Citizens, individuals 65 years old and over commonly referred to as Elder Financial Abuse Act.

There are approximately 9 million residents of California aged 65+, of which a substantial number have at one time or another purchased property from Amazon, which makes their situation a monumental dilemma for Jeff Bezos and his Amazon company.

California Penal Code sections 368(d) and 368(e) Elder Financial Abuse and Civil Code Section § 1575

Elder Financial Abuse is both a civil tort and a criminal offense.

It is not necessary under these statutes that the taker maintain an intent to defraud; rather, a person is guilty of committing financial elder abuse so long as it would be obvious to a reasonable person that the taker is not entitled to the elder’s assets.

When Amazon for instance charges a Senior for its "Prime" account and sells them 'stolen goods, counterfeit, dangerous and/or defective products it could be construed as by false pretenses and thusly Elder Financial Abuse may have taken place in which the law now can be invoked to protect the financial wherewithal of the deceived individual.

The State of California only requires that the aggreived need be a California resident, 65 years of age and cheated in some amount not specified, basically defrauded in any amount for this law to kick in.

California Penal Code sections 368(d) and 368(e)

(d) Any person who is not a caretaker who violates any provision of law proscribing theft, embezzlement, forgery, or fraud, or who violates Section 530.5 proscribing identity theft, with respect to the property or personal identifying information of an elder or a dependent adult, and who knows or reasonably should know that the victim is an elder or a dependent adult, is punishable as follows:   

(1) By a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for two, three, or four years, or by both that fine and imprisonment, when the moneys, labor, goods, services, or real or personal property taken or obtained is of a value exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars ($950).   

(2) By a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment, when the moneys, labor, goods, services, or real or personal property taken or obtained is of a value not exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars ($950).  
 
(e) Any caretaker of an elder or a dependent adult who violates any provision of law proscribing theft, embezzlement, forgery, or fraud, or who violates Section 530.5 proscribing identity theft, with respect to the property or personal identifying information of that elder or dependent adult, is punishable as follows:  

(1) By a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for two, three, or four years, or by both that fine and imprisonment, when the moneys, labor, goods, services, or real or personal property taken or obtained is of a value exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars ($950).  

(2) By a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment, when the moneys, labor, goods, services, or real or personal property taken or obtained is of a value not exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars ($950).
 
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.07.  

"Abuse of an elder or a dependent adult" means either of the following:

(a) Physical abuse, neglect, financial abuse, abandonment, isolation, abduction, or other treatment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental suffering.
 
(b) The deprivation by a care custodian of goods or services that are necessary to avoid physical harm or mental suffering.
 
15610.27. "Elder" means any person residing in this state, 65 years of age or older.

California Welfare and Institutions Code 15610.30.  

(a) "Financial abuse" of an elder or dependent adult occurs when a person or entity does any of the following:

(1) Takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult for a wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both.
 
(2) Assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult for a wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both.
 
(3) Takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains, or assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining, real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult by undue influence, as defined in Section 15610.70 and by Section 1575 of the Civil Code.
 
 (b) A person or entity shall be deemed to have taken, secreted, appropriated, obtained, or retained property for a wrongful use if, among other things, the person or entity takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains the property and the person or entity knew or should have known that this conduct is likely to be harmful to the elder or dependent adult.
 
 (c) For purposes of this section, a person or entity takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains real or personal property when an elder or dependent adult is deprived of any property right, including by means of an agreement, donative transfer, or testamentary bequest, regardless of whether the property is held directly or by a representative of an elder or dependent adult.

Not all of California's 9 million residents 65+ years are involved with everything stated herein however a vast majority may have the circumstances regarding their respective dealings with Amazon creating monumental legal ramifications with potential

California Welfare and Institutions Code section § 15657.5 provides:

(a) Where it is proven by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant is liable for financial abuse, as defined n Section 15610.30, in addition to all other remedies otherwise provided by law, the court shall award to the plaintiff reasonable attorney's fees and costs. The term "costs" includes, but is not limited to, reasonable fees for the services of a conservator, if any, devoted to the litigation of a claim brought under this article.

(b) Where it is proven by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant is liable for financial abuse, as defined in Section 15610.30, and where it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has been guilty of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice in the commission of the abuse, in addition to reasonable attorney's fees and costs set forth in subdivision (a), and all other remedies otherwise provided by law, the following shall apply:

(1) The limitations imposed by Section 377.34 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the damages recoverable shall not apply.

(2) The standards set forth in subdivision (b) of Section 3294 of the Civil Code regarding the imposition of punitive damages on an employer based upon the acts of an employee shall be satisfied before any damages or attorney's fees permitted under this section may be imposed against an employer.

(c) Nothing in this section affects the award of punitive damages under Section 3294 of the Civil Code.

One of the absolutely fantastic scenarios regarding California's Elder Financial Abuse Act is should a Plaintiff decide to file a lawsuit against a Defendant the law states that if the Plaintiff prevails then is awarded reasonable costs and attorney fees however conversely if does not prevail the Plaintiff has no legal obligation to reimburse the Defendant any of their costs or attorney fees.

The California legislature decided to give tremendous teeth to this law so seniors would be more inclined to pursue their perpetrator knowing that if they were not successful they would not be burdened with a horrific legal expense of the Defendant.

Being aware of this above information it would appear that there may well be numerous lawsuits initiated against any company that has willfully and knowingly sold among other things 'stolen goods' to the vulnerable California residents over the age of 65 and even possibly the other 49 states residents as well depending on the various laws pertaining to their situations!

Is Amazon a "Criminal Enterprise" disguised as an e-commerce shopping website to take advantage of the general populace by "Price Fixing" for the express purpose of driving the competition out of business so Amazon will then have a true monopoly so huge that they can increase their prices exponentially at will when the consumer has very few other choices of where to purchase their goods?

The United States Congress, both the House of Representatives and the Senate, chastised Jeff Bezos personally, along with Amazon the company, for numerous inappropriate transgressions and potential illegal activities time and time again of which most of the letters sent to them regarding their unethical behavior are contained within this website. It appears that neither Jeff Bezos nor any of the other Amazon executives are able to comprehend the gravity of their misdeeds and how those actions negatively impact their loyal customers and their dedicated employees.

If this organization can’t get their act together and discontinue their abhorrent behavior then maybe it’s time that Congress creates significant restraints and severely limit their ability to partake in activities that harm others.


The Sherman Antitrust Act outlaws "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade," and any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to monopolize." Long ago, the Supreme Court decided that the Sherman Act does not prohibit every restraint of trade, only those that are unreasonable. For instance, in some sense, an agreement between two individuals to form a partnership restrains trade, but may not do so unreasonably, and thus may be lawful under the antitrust laws. On the other hand, certain acts are considered so harmful to competition that they are almost always illegal. These include plain arrangements among competing individuals or businesses to fix prices, divide markets, or rig bids. These acts are "per se" violations of the Sherman Act; in other words, no defense or justification is allowed.
The Laws governing the American people are derived from the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights which includes one of the most important, the First Amendment, allowing Free Speech which means we can all speak our voices without fear of prosecution.

This website is a repository to disseminate and publish important information regarding any potentially illegal or unethical activities by the leadership management of the Amazon (dot com) Inc. organization and will be constantly updated as facts become known and available.

Amazon is Notorious for being involved with intolerable actions within its ranks and the company should be broken up into numerous different and smaller parts or eliminated completely due to them allowing despicable acts to occur and Amazon has been accused by several governmental agencies for deplorable activities such as Anti Competitive Business, Antitrust Concerns, Bribery, Counterfeit Products, Defective Products, Discrimination, Fake Product Reviews, Illegal Insider Stock Trading, Intellectual Property Piracy, Market Dominance, Predatory Pricing, Price Fixing, Price Gouging, Racism, Retaliation, Receiving and Selling 'Stolen Goods', Sexism, Sexual Harassment, Social Injustice, Unethical Practices and Unsafe Working Conditions just to name a few.
Notorious Markets - The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) reports on the adequacy and effectiveness of trading partners’ protection of intellectual property rights and the findings of its Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy, which highlights online and physical markets that reportedly engage in and facilitate substantial trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy.

“The Trump Administration is committed to holding intellectual property rights violators accountable and to ensuring that American innovators and creators have a full and fair opportunity to use and profit from their work,” said U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer.

The United States Government has determined that Amazon, the company founded and operated by the richest man in the world Jeff Bezos, facilitates the criminal activity of trademark counterfeiting and piracy of products sales to billions of people around the globe for which Amazon profits enormously through these highly illegal actions.

White House trade and economic adviser Peter Navarro defended the decision to add the Amazon websites to the notorious markets list saying "This is an action clearly justified by the behavior of the worst counterfeit-enabler in the world and the Amazon brain trust would rather fight this out in the media through their swamp-creature spin doctors than clean up their marketplace in the urgent ways necessary to protect the American people from fraud and often physical harm from dangerous counterfeit products."

under construction...

The President of the United States and Leader of the Free World, Joe Biden, states emphatically that Facebook is Killing People, then obviously it must be totally true so therefore we must all be afraid of Facebook’s lack of concern for our lives which are at risk each and every day that Facebook allows and condones misinformation on his Facebook platform regarding the COVID-19 virus to be promoted on Facebook that could kill us.

Facebook members be aware! Millions of people could die due to Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook!

FacebookSexTrafficking.com

FacebookHumanSmuggling.com

FacebookKillingPeople.com

FacebookWhistleblowers.com

FacebookPedophiles.com

FacebookChildAbuse.com

FacebookDiscrimination.com

FacebookRacism.com

FacebookIncSucks.com

FacebookKillsPeople.com

MessengerSucks.com

WhatsAppSucks.com

This website will be an ongoing repository of fact gathering and reporting of a multitude of news articles pertaining to Facebook’s dangerous activities that negatively affect our very existence.

Facebook Killing People, Facebook Sex Trafficking, Facebook Human Smuggling, Facebook Discrimination, Facebook Racism, Facebook Child Abuse, Facebook Pedophiles and Facebook Whistleblowers are of great concern to everyone and we should all be leery of Facebook’s actions against free people everywhere!

Mark Zuckerberg and his Facebook platform have a blatant disregard for human suffering and his only concern is his insatiable thirst for the almighty DOLLAR $$$$$$$ regardless of who may die!
AmazonAntitrustParadox.com
Amazon Antitrust Paradox

AmazonUnbound.com
Amazon Unbound

CartwrightAct.com
Cartwright Act

AmazonDarkPatterns.com
Amazon Dark Patterns

FacebookDarkPatterns.com
Facebook Dark Patterns

GoogleDarkPatterns.com
Google Dark Patterns


ProjectBernanke.com
Project Bernanke

FairContractingPractices.com
Fair Contracting Practices 


​AmazonAntitrustLawsuit.com
Amazon Antitrust Lawsuit

AmazonAplenty.com
Amazon Aplenty

AmazonStolenGoods.com
Amazon Stolen Goods

AmazonEUAntitrust.com
Amazon EU Antitrust

​AmazonBribery.com
​Amazon Bribery

AmazonIllegalContent.com
​Amazon Illegal Content

AmazonCriminalAntitrust.com
Amazon Criminal Antitrust

AmazonCorruption.com
​Amazon Corruption

AmazonFalseAdvertising.com
​Amazon False Advertising 

AmazonGoogleCollusion.com
Amazon Google Collusion

​AmazonClimateJustice.com
​Amazon Climate Justice

AmazonMonopolyPower.com
​Amazon Monopoly Power

​AmazonClimateChange.com
​Amazon Climate Change

​​AmazonConnections.com
​Amazon Connections

​AmazonNotoriousMarkets.com
​Amazon Notorious Markets

​AmazonLaws.com
​Amazon Laws

AmazonAntitrustConspiracy.com
Amazon Antitrust Conspiracy

​AmazonFakeReviews.com
​Amazon Fake Reviews

​AmazonInsiderTrading.com
​Amazon Insider Trading

​AmazonMarketDominance.com
​Amazon Market Dominance

​AmazonSexualHarassment.com
​Amazon Sexual Harassment

​AmazonRetaliation.com
​Amazon Retaliation

​AmazonSexism.com
​Amazon Sexism

​AmazonSocialJustice.com
​Amazon Social Justice

​AmazonRacism.com
​Amazon Racism

​AmazonDiscrimination.com
​Amazon Discrimination

​AmazonRacistGraffiti.com
​Amazon Racist Graffiti

​AmazonUnsafeConditions.com
​Amazon Unsafe Conditions

​AmazonFacialRecognition.com
​Amazon Facial Recognition

​AmazonUnethicalPractices.com
Amazon Unethical Practices

​AmazonAntiCompetitive.com
​Amazon Anti Competitive

​AmazonCounterfeitProducts.com
​Amazon Counterfeit Products

​AmazonDefectiveProducts.com
​Amazon Defective Products

​AmazonInvests.com
​Amazon Invests

​AmazonClimateFoundation.com
​Amazon Climate Foundation

​AmazonPledges.com
​Amazon Pledges

​AmazonEarthPledge.com
​Amazon Earth Pledge

​AmazonClimateAction.com
​Amazon Climate Action

​AmazonClimateFund.com
Amazon Climate Fund

​AmazonEarthFund.com
​Amazon Earth Fund

​AmazonVentureFund.com
​Amazon Venture Fund

​AmazonAerospace.com
Amazon Aerospace

​AmazonSpaceForce.com
​Amazon Space Force

AmazonPiracy.com
​Amazon Piracy

​AmazonPolicies.com
​Amazon Policies

​AmazonPolitics.com
Amazon Politics

​AmazonPredatoryPricing.com
​Amazon Predatory Pricing

​AmazonPrinciples.com
Amazon Principles

AmazonPriceFixing.com
​Amazon Price Fixing

​AmazonShareholders.com
Amazon Shareholders

​AmazonTrademarks.com
​Amazon Trademarks

​AmazonSportsCenter.com
​Amazon Sports Center

​AmazonHockeyCenter.com
Amazon Hockey Center

AmazonWhistleblowers.com
Amazon Whistleblowers

AppleMonopoly.com
Apple Monopoly

​BezosMonopoly.com
​Bezos Monopoly

​BezosPhilanthropy.com

Bezos Philanthropy

BigTechAntitrust.com
Big Tech Antitrust


ClimatePledgeFoundation.com
Climate Pledge Foundation

​ClimatePledgeFoundation.org
Climate Pledge Foundation

ClimatePledgeFoundation.co
Climate Pledge Foundation

ClimatePledgeFoundation.us
Climate Pledge Foundation


AntitrustConspiracy.com
Antitrust Conspiracy

GoogleChromeSucks.com
Google Chrome Sucks

GoogleSearchSucks.com
Google Search Sucks

AntitrustEnforcement.com
Antitrust Enforcement

Section230.co
Section 230

​INFORMConsumersAct.org
Inform Consumers Act

​ShopSafeAct2020.com
Shop Safe Act 2020

​SANTAAct.com
SANTA Act

SuperiorCourt.us
Superior Court

DigitalMarketsAct.com
Digital Markets Act

ClimateLegislation.com
Climate Legislation


CivilRightsEnvoy.com
Civil Rights Envoy

​CivilRightsPledge.com

Civil Rights Pledge

AClimatePledge.org
A Climate Pledge

​ClimateFriendlyPledge.com
Climate Friendly Pledge


AntitrustConspiracy.com
Antitrust Conspiracy

​NotoriousMarkets.com
Notorious Markets

​ClimatePledgeFriendly.com
Climate Pledge Friendly

iNewsBureau.com
iNews Bureau

iClimatePledge.com
i Climate Pledge

​​AClimateChangeArena.com

A Climate Pledge Arena

AmericanIndians.co
American Indians

​ItTakesAllofUs.org

It Takes All of Us

​BlackLivesMatterPledge.com
Black Lives Matter Pledge


​BlackLivesMatterPledge.org
Black Lives Matter Pledge


JusticePolicing.com
Justice Policing

​InformConsumersAct.com
Inform Consumers Act

​ShopSafeAmerica.org
Shop Safe America

​AntiRacismPledge.com
Anti Racism Pledge

​PreventClimateWarming.com
Prevent Climate Warming


RacialEqualityPledge.com
Racial Equality Pledge

SexualHarassmentPledge.org
Sexual Harassment Pledge

AmericansPledge.com

Americans Pledge

ClaytonAntitrustAct.us
Clayton Antitrust Act

RepealSection230.us
Repeal Section 230

​GiftPledge.org
Gift Pledge

UnitedStatesConstitution.co
United States Constitution

ShermanAntitrust.com
Sherman Antitrust

ShermanAntitrustAct.us
Sherman Antitrust Act

​AmericansClimatePledge.com
Americans Climate Pledge

AmericansClimatePledge.us

Americans Climate Pledge

AsiaClimateChange.com
Asia Climate Change

​AClimatePledge.com

A Climate Pledge

AClimatePledge.us
A Climate Pledge

AClimatePledgeArena.com
A Climate Pledge Arena

AClimatePledgeArena.co
A Climate Pledge Arena


AClimatePledgeArena.us
A Climate Pledge Arena

BigTechAntitrust.com
Big Tech Antitrust


ClimatePledgeArena.co
Climate Pledge Arena


ClimatePledgeArena.tv
Climate Pledge Arena

AmericanHistory.co
American History


MedalofFreedom.us
Medal of Freedom


MedalofFreedom.co
Medal of Freedom

PresidentialMedalofFreedom.us
Presidential Medal of Freedom

PresidentialMedalofFreedom.co
Presidential Medal of Freedom

​CongressionalMedalofHonor.us
Congressional Medal of Honor

CongressionalMedalofHonor.co
Congressional Medal of Honor

​CongressionalGoldMedal.us
Congressional Gold Medal

CongressionalGoldMedal.co
Congressional Gold Medal


​​MedalofValor.us
Medal of Valor

​CitizensMedal.us
Citizens Medal


​KoreanWar.us
Korean War

KoreanWar.co
Korean War


​VietnamWar.us
Vietnam War

VietnamWar.co
Vietnam War

SpanishAmericanWar.co
Spanish American War

RevolutionaryWar.co
Revolutionary War


HistoricalDocuments.co
Historical Documents

HistoricalDocuments.us
Historical Documents

ClassActionLawsuits.us
Class Action Lawsuits

ClassActionLawsuits.co
Class Action Lawsuits


​RestartAct.com
Restart Act


HumanTraffickingPledge.org
Human Trafficking Pledge

ClimateWarmingCrisis.com
Climate Warming Crisis

​SocialJusticePledge.com
Social Justice Pledge

​AClimatePledge.co

A Climate Pledge

​ParisClimatePact.com
Paris Climate Pact


​RacialJusticePledge.com
Racial Justice Pledge

​ParisAgreementPledge.com
Paris Agreement Pledge

EarthClimatePledge.com
Earth Climate Pledge

ClimateWarmingPledge.com
Climate Warming Pledge


1stAmendment.co
1st Amendment

​EarnItAct.com
EARN It Act

FirstAmendment.co
First Amendment


​CleanEconomyAct.com
Clean Economy Act

​PlanetClimatePledge.com

Planet Climate Pledge

​ParisClimatePledge.com
Paris Climate Pledge

​MeTooPledge.com

Me Too Pledge

MajorLeagueTelevision.com
Major League Television

MajorLeagueSports.co
Major League Sports


​EqualRightsPledge.com
Equal Rights Pledge


WorldClimatePledge.com
World Climate Pledge

​ClimatePledgeCenter.com
Climate Pledge Center

​ClimatePledgeHockey.com

Climate Pledge Hockey

​ClimatePledgeSports.com
Climate Pledge Sports

​SeattleClimateArena.com
Seattle Climate Arena

​SeattleConcertArena.com
Seattle Concert Arena

​SeattleSportsArena.com
Seattle Sports Arena

​SeattleSportsCenter.com
Seattle Sports Center

​SeattleSportsStadium.com
Seattle Sports Stadium

​SeattleHockeyArena.com

Seattle Hockey Arena

SeattleHockeyCenter.com
Seattle Hockey Center

​SeattleHockeyStadium.com
Seattle Hockey Stadium

​SeattleIceCentre.com
Seattle Ice Centre

​SeattleBasketballArena.com
Seattle Basketball Arena

​SeattleBasketballCenter.com
Seattle Basketball Center

​SeattleSportsTV.com
Seattle Sports TV

​SeattleCenterSports.com
Seattle Center Sports

​SeattleCenterHockey.com
Seattle Center Hockey

​SeattleCenterStadium.com
Seattle Center Stadium

​SeattleArenaSports.com
Seattle Arena Sports

​SeattleArenaHockey.com
Seattle Arena Hockey

​TheSeattleCenter.com
The Seattle Center

​NorthgateHockeyArena.com
Northgate Hockey Arena

NorthgateHockeyCenter.com
Northgate Hockey Center


USCrimeLaw.com
US Crime Law

AndyJassySucksJeffBezos.com
Andy Jassy Sucks Jeff Bezos - NOT FOR SALE

AndyJassySucksSundarPichai.com
Andy Jassy Sucks Sundar Pichai - NOT FOR SALE

AudibleSucks.com
Audible Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


AmazonAWSSucks.com
Amazon AWS Sucks - NOT FOR SALE

AmazonCareSucks.com
Amazon Care Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


AmazonCloudSucks.com

Amazon Cloud Sucks - NOT FOR SALE

AmazonFreshGrocerySucks.com

Amazon Fresh Grocery Sucks - NOT FOR SALE

AmazonFulfillmentSucks.com
Amazon Fulfillment Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE


AmazonGamesSucks.com
Amazon Games Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE

AmazonGoogleSucks.com
Amazon Google Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


AmazonGoSucks.com
Amazon Go Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


AmazonGrocerySucks.com
Amazon Grocery Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


AmazonMarketplaceSucks.com
Amazon Marketplace Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


AmazonMusicSucks.com
Amazon Music Sucks - NOT FOR SALE

AmazonPrimeSucks.co
Amazon Prime Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE


AmazonPrimeVideoSucks.com
Amazon Prime Video Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE

AmazonSellersSucks.com
Amazon Sellers Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


AmazonStudiosSucks.com
Amazon Studios Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE

AmazonSucksGoogle.com
Amazon Sucks Google - NOT FOR SALE


AmazonTwitchSucks.com
Amazon Twitch Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


AmazonWebServiceSucks.com
Amazon Web Service Sucks -
NOT FOR SALE

AWSCloudSucks.com
AWS Cloud Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


BezosAcademySucks.com
Bezos Academy Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


BezosDayOneFundSucks.com
Bezos Day One Fund Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


BezosDay1FundSucks.com
Bezos Day 1 Fund Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


BezosEarthFundSucks.com
Bezos Earth Fund Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


BezosSucksPichai.com
Bezos Sucks Pichai - NOT FOR SALE


ClimatePledgeArenaSucks.com
Climate Pledge Arena Sucks - NOT FOR SALE

FacebookIncSucks.com
Facebook Inc Sucks -
NOT FOR SALE

GoogleAmazonSucks.com
Google Amazon Sucks -
NOT FOR SALE

GoogleChromeSucks.com
Google Chrome Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE

GoogleSearchSucks.com
Google Search Sucks -
NOT FOR SALE

GoogleMonopoly.com
Google Monopoly


GoogleSucksAmazon.com
Google Sucks Amazon - NOT FOR SALE


GoogleWhistleblowers.com
Google Whistleblowers


IMDBTVSucks.com
IMDBTV Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE

IMDBSucks.co
IMDB Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


Instagram-Sucks.com
Instagram Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE

JassySucksBezos.com
Jassy Sucks Bezos - NOT FOR SALE


JassySucksPichai.com

Jassy Sucks Pichai - NOT FOR SALE

JeffBezosSucksAndyJassy.com
Jeff Bezos Sucks Andy Jassy
- NOT FOR SALE

JeffBezosSucksChristianSmalls.com
Jeff Bezos Sucks Christian Smalls
- NOT FOR SALE


JeffBezosSucksSergeyBrin.com
Jeff Bezos Sucks Sergey Brin - NOT FOR SALE

JeffBezosSucksSundarPichai.com
Jeff Bezos Sucks Sundar Pichai - NOT FOR SALE


MarkZuckerberg-Sucks.com
Mark Zuckerberg Sucks -
NOT FOR SALE

MessengerSucks.com
Messenger Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


PichaiSucksBezos.com
Pichai Sucks Bezos - NOT FOR SALE


PrimeVideoSucks.com
Prime Video Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE

PrimeVideoSucks.co
Prime Video Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE

SergeyBrinSucksAndyJassy.com
Sergey Brin Sucks Andy Jassy
- NOT FOR SALE

SergeyBrinSucksJeffBezos.com
Sergey Brin Sucks Jeff Bezos -
NOT FOR SALE

SergeyBrinSucksSundarPichai.com
Sergey Brin Sucks Sundar Pichai -
NOT FOR SALE

SundarPichaiSucksAndyJassy.com
Sundar Pichai Sucks Andy Jassy
- NOT FOR SALE

SundarPichaiSucksJeffBezos.com
Sundar Pichai Sucks Jeff Bezos
- NOT FOR SALE

TheBlueOriginSucks.com
The Blue Origin Sucks
-
NOT FOR SALE

TheWashingtonPostSucks.com
The Washington Post Sucks
-
NOT FOR SALE

ThrasioSucks.com
Thrasio Sucks -
NOT FOR SALE

TwitchTVSucks.com
Twitch TV Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE

TwitchSucks.co
Twitch Sucks -
NOT FOR SALE

WashPostSucks.com
Wash Post Sucks
- NOT FOR SALE


WashingtonPostSucks.co
Washington Post Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


WhatsAppSucks.com
WhatsApp Sucks - NOT FOR SALE


WonderySucks.com
Wondery Sucks - NOT FOR SALE

WholeFoodsMarketSucks.com
Whole Foods Market Sucks - NOT FOR SALE

WholeFoodsSucks.co
Whole Foods Sucks -
NOT FOR SALE

Site powered by Weebly. Managed by Rebel.com
  • Home